Skip to content

Conversation

kakabisht
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@sunilarjun sunilarjun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @kakabisht! Left some edit comments below, but some other changes are needed on this page that I'll note here:

The note on lines 42-44 needs editing, suggesting:

NeuVector installations that have the single sign-on integration with Rancher Manager and the Remote Repository Configuration disabled are not affected by this issue.

The phrasing of line 46 I think should be updated as well, suggestiong below:

In the patched version, X-R-Sess is partially masked so that users can confirm what is being used while still keeping it safe for consumption. The log, which includes `personal_access_token`, `token`, `rekor_public_key`, `root_cert`, `sct_public_key`, and `public key` are removed, as the request body is not mandatory in the log.

The note on line 48 needs the closing ::: after line 52.

The bullet points are erroring from lines 66-70. Suggestion below:

* Contact the [SUSE Rancher Security team](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/policy).
* Open an issue in the [NeuVector GitHub repository](https://github.com/neuvector/neuvector/issues/new/choose).
* References:
  * [NeuVector Support Matrix](https://www.suse.com/suse-neuvector/support-matrix/all-supported-versions/neuvector-v-all-versions/)
  * [Product Support Lifecycle](https://www.suse.com/lifecycle/#suse-security)

These changes will also need to be applied to the page in the 5.4 folder as well. Please let me know if you have any questions, thanks!

@@ -7,8 +7,12 @@ NeuVector is committed to informing the community of security issues. Below is a
| ID | Description | Date | Release |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
| ID | Description | Date | Release |
| ID | Description | Date | Resolution |

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not part of changes but this should be updated to be clear to users on the resolution version/date. Standard with what can be seen on the RM table for example.

Comment on lines +12 to +15
| [CVE-2025-46808](?) | Sensitive information may be logged in the manager container depending on logging configuration and credential permissions. For more information, refer to [ Sensitive information exposure in NeuVector manager container logs](#sensitive-information-exposure-in-neuvector-manager-container-logs) | ? | [NeuVector v5.4.5](https://github.com/neuvector/neuvector/releases/tag/v5.4.5) |


| — | . Fixed in 5.4.5. | < 5.0.0 – 5.4.4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
| [CVE-2025-46808](?) | Sensitive information may be logged in the manager container depending on logging configuration and credential permissions. For more information, refer to [ Sensitive information exposure in NeuVector manager container logs](#sensitive-information-exposure-in-neuvector-manager-container-logs) | ? | [NeuVector v5.4.5](https://github.com/neuvector/neuvector/releases/tag/v5.4.5) |
| — | . Fixed in 5.4.5. | < 5.0.0 – 5.4.4
| CVE-2025-46808 | Sensitive information may be logged in the manager container depending on logging configuration and credential permissions. For more information, refer to [Sensitive information exposure in NeuVector manager container logs](#sensitive-information-exposure-in-neuvector-manager-container-logs). | 09 Jul 2025 | [NeuVector v5.4.5](https://github.com/neuvector/neuvector/releases/tag/v5.4.5) |

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did some research in the NV repo and RM repo for security link but I didn't see any items regarding CVE-2025-46808, do you have any more context @kakabisht ? Otherwise may need to follow-up with Security to see if they might know where the CVE is hosted to get a link. We can have no link for now and the link to the section below gives appropriate information to resolve.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants